artistic depiction of the concept of Year Zero, featuring ancient Roman numerals transitioning into early Christian symbols on a historical timelin

How Did We Choose the Year Zero (or Rather, the Year 1)?

—

by

Made of Rome
in

The concept of numbering years from a specific starting point might feel intuitive now, but the system we use today has a surprisingly complex and fascinating history. What is commonly called the “Year Zero” wasn’t actually calculated during Jesus Christ’s lifetime but centuries later, with potential mistakes that still intrigue historians and astronomers. And, as always, the Romans had a role to play in shaping the calendar we use today.

The Roman Calendar Before Christ

Before the adoption of our modern dating system, the Romans counted years based on key events, typically referencing the reigns of emperors or significant events in Roman history. A common Roman method was to count from the founding of Rome (known as ab urbe condita, or “AUC”), which was traditionally set at 753 BCE.

For example, the year we call 1 CE would have been Anno 754 AUC. This system reflected Rome’s centrality in its empire but didn’t provide a universal, standardized system. Other cultures, like the Greeks or Egyptians, used their own dating methods, further complicating things.

How the Year “1” Was Established

The modern system of numbering years as “Before Christ” (BC) and “Anno Domini” (AD, meaning “in the year of the Lord”) was devised by a 6th-century monk named Dionysius Exiguus. His goal was to establish a calendar centered on the birth of Jesus Christ rather than the reign of the Roman emperor Diocletian, who was infamous for persecuting Christians.

Dionysius calculated that Jesus was born 753 years after the founding of Rome. He designated this year as Anno Domini 1—there was no “Year 0,” as the concept of zero wasn’t commonly used in Europe at the time. Instead, the system transitioned directly from 1 BC to AD 1.

Possible Mistakes in the Calculation

Despite Dionysius’s intentions, modern historians believe his calculations were off by several years. Here’s why:

  1. Herod’s Death: The Bible records that Jesus was born during the reign of King Herod, who, according to historical records, died in 4 BCE. This means Jesus’s birth likely occurred a few years earlier than Dionysius’s estimate.
  2. Astronomical Events: The Star of Bethlehem, described in the Gospel of Matthew, is often interpreted as a comet or conjunction of planets. Some astronomers suggest such events occurred around 7-6 BCE, further supporting an earlier date for Jesus’s birth.
  3. Roman Census Records: Luke’s Gospel mentions a census ordered by Emperor Augustus. However, historical evidence for such a census around 1 CE is sparse, and records suggest it might have taken place earlier.

The Roman Influence on Timekeeping

Rome’s influence on the development of calendars cannot be overstated. Julius Caesar’s introduction of the Julian calendar in 46 BCE created a system that standardized months and leap years across the empire. This calendar became the foundation for Dionysius’s work centuries later.

Additionally, the concept of aligning significant dates with political or religious symbolism was deeply Roman. For example, Roman emperors often aligned their reigns or major reforms with auspicious dates, a practice mirrored in the Church’s desire to align the calendar with the birth of Christ.

Fun Fact

The absence of a “Year Zero” in our calendar causes some quirky issues. For instance, the transition from 1 BC to AD 1 means that the 21st century actually began on January 1, 2001—not January 1, 2000, as many believed!

Why It Matters

The decision to base the calendar on the birth of Christ and the Roman tradition of standardizing time were pivotal in shaping how we think about history. However, the small errors in Dionysius’s calculations remind us that history is always a blend of precision and interpretation.

Closing Thoughts

While Dionysius Exiguus aimed to center time on the birth of Christ, his work also highlights the enduring legacy of Roman culture in shaping global systems. From counting years ab urbe condita to modern Gregorian reforms, the Romans laid the groundwork for how we understand and organize time today. And even if the exact “Year Zero” remains elusive, the story of its calculation connects us to the enduring interplay of faith, science, and Roman ingenuity.